(Steve Talbott)
If the battery-powered badge your waiter is
wearing suddenly starts flashing as s/he
serves you dinner, you'd better pull out
your portable germ blaster. The uncouth
person did not wash their hands after using
the bathroom.
An electronic system called Hygiene Guard
(produced by Net/Tech International in
New Jersey) is now being installed in
restaurants, hospitals, and other facilities
where personal hygiene is a matter of
public concern. A smart badge! worn by
untrustworthy employees communicates
with sensors in the bathroom that are
connected to a computer in a manager's
office .... Unless an employee uses the
soap dispenser and stands for a required
amount of time in front of a sink with
running water, an infraction will be
recorded on the computer. In some
instance the employee's badge will flash.
(Albany Times Union, 31 August 1997)
Civil libertarians, worried about increasing
electronic intrusion in the workplace, cite
Big Brother. I won't quarrel with them
nor will I quarrel with those who point out
that personal hygiene in these situations is
a matter that transcends the isolated
individual and his precious rights, with
grave implications for other people. No,
what impresses me apart from the
clownishness of the situation is the
impossibility of solution along primarily
technical lines.
According to the Times Union report, a
recent study shows that only two-thirds of
all people wash their hands after using the
bathroom, even though more than nine of
the ten report in interviews that they do
so. Clearly, then, the problem includes
issues of honesty and social responsibility.
Does anyone really believe that coercive
measures will meaningfully improve the
situation? Will the reduced risk from
newly obedient employees count more in
the final equation than the radically
increased risk from the inevitable few who
respond to the system in a spirit of
rebellion? Personally, for my own safety,
I'll make it a point never to dine in a
facility where I know Hygiene Guard is
installed.
You will recognize in this an echo of my
earlier remarks about technologically
protected privacy (NF #28): The increasing
technical mediation of our social checks
and balances weakens the social bonds that
are the only real guarantee of the values
we are trying to protect. To the degree we
employ technology, we must redouble our
commitment to the strength of the
underlying social matrix.
I don't understand how it could possibly
occur to a manager that a
several-thousand-dollar piece of equipment
(and don't forget the maintenance, the
support, the training ... ) could prove more
effective than actually confronting the
problem in a straightforward, mutually
empowering way within his group. The
choice of a high-tech solution doesn't say
much for how the human side of these
organizations is being managed.
|
Tel: 01763 273 475 Fax: 01763 273 255 Web: Webmaster Queries: Ask Here |
Join UKUUG Today! |
UKUUG Secretariat PO BOX 37 Buntingford Herts SG9 9UQ |